From: | John Randall QC <jrandall@st-philips.com> |
To: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 16/12/2011 11:56:08 UTC |
Subject: | RE: Santa guilty of negligence? |
It will of course be appreciated that this was a
decision of Three Wise Men.
Happy Christmas!
John
JOHN RANDALL QC
St Philips Chambers
55
Tel +44 (0)121 246 7000 (DDI 246 2126)
Fax +44 (0)121 246 7001
Email jr@st-philips.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Eoin O'Dell [mailto:ODELLE@tcd.ie]
Sent: 16 December 2011 10:39
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: RE: Santa guilty of negligence?
Dear all,
On the inevitable 'elf-n-safety' (sorry) issues, have
a look at
http://legalbizzle.wordpress.com/2011/12/13/the-santa-claus-letters-2-elf-n-safety/
Eoin.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Eoin O'Dell
+353-87-202 1120 (mb) // http://www.cearta.ie
+353-1-677 0449 (fax) // http://cearta.poserous.com
+353-1-896 1178 (vm) // http://twitter.com/cearta
--------------------------------------------------------------
All opinions are personal: no legal responsibility is
accepted
for this email or attachments, which may be
confidential or
privileged or subject to a Freedom of Information
request:
if you have received this in error, let me know and
delete it.
Please think 'green' before printing. Thanks.
________________________________________
From: Donald Macdonald [d.r.macdonald@dundee.ac.uk]
Sent: 16 December 2011 10:34
To: Andrew Dickinson; obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: Re: Santa guilty of negligence?
Careful analysis shows that Santa apparently only has
one elf, something which can only be possible since the
Ross Macdonald
************************************************************
Please consider the environment. Do you really need to
print this email?
>>> Andrew Dickinson
<andrew.dickinson@sydney.edu.au> 12/16/2011 9:57 am >>>
On 14 December 2011, the Court of Appeal in an ex
tempore judgment (Ducasse v Melbry Events) held that Santa and/or one of his
Elves had been negligent in failing to spot an icicle on the floor of his
grotto over which the claimant tripped, causing a leg injury. The defendant
operator of the grotto (no doubt, a corporate device used by St Nick to protect
North Pole assets from seizure in execution) was held to have breached its
occupier’s duty of care. From a Lawtel summary of the decision, it appears that
the Court was impressed with the safety system used by Santa and the Elf (which
had required Santa to check for debris from his throne), but concluded that it
was possible that Santa and the Elf were not as careful in the taking of
precautions as they should have been.
So, after his success in Miracle on
Happy Christmas to all list members.
Best wishes
Andrew
ANDREW DICKINSON | Professor in Private International
Law
Faculty of Law
THE
F10 - The New
T +61 2 9351 0240 (Sydney) / +44 1206 398114 (
E
andrew.dickinson@sydney.edu.au<mailto:andrew.dickinson@sydney.edu.au> | W
http://sydney.edu.au/law
The
Scanned by MailDefender - managed email security from
intY - www.maildefender.net